A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To Dystopia

The Empire off lies was laid as bare. We are in the Emperor's New Clothes moment led by Silicon Valley technoratti to a rapidly evaporating, incredulous audience.

Photography is my lifelong love and it pairs very nicely with my activism so many hours are dedicated to sorting images while listening to podcasts. In general very little causes me to stop sorting to hunt for details, but Dr. Robert Malone saying Twitter won’t give him a blue check made me look. Not because I didn’t believe Dr. Malone; Twitter is very petty and wouldn’t verify Julian Assange making it easier for spoof accounts to thrive. Who benefits from that? Not the public nor individual users.

As a member of the digital diaspora since 2020 the “check user“ function was unfamiliar. Twitter gets very few minutes of my day scanning a handful of my favorite accounts indifferent to prohibited interaction. But today in a hunt that trumped my pictures I learned we already have social credit scores and numbers that rank accounts by usefulness to Empire

It started with Dr. Malone’s rank “Normal 24%“ on his profile. What in the world did that mean? The category designations are idiotic, but it’s clear the higher the number the greater threat you pose. They score like golf where the lowest number is a perfect score. Fitting bit of irony where all the zeroes are.

Dr. Malone. the inventor of mRNA technology may have DTRA clearances but his trust level on Twitter ranked by BotSentinal pales in comparison to PhARMA Golden Boy, Scott Gottlieb and his corp supporters who all get a perfect score of zero.

So CNN has a perfect truthfulness rating, despite a full bench of confirmed liars and and countless errors that hint at journalistic malpractice. Most of us know what frauds the media “experts“ are or remember when someone points it out for us.

That activity highlighting the liars and crimes scores Glenn Greenwald a rating of 30% close behind Dr Malone, but both a far distance from Pfizer and CNN.

Checking the user ranks led to a more startling discovery, though it’s very likely other voices in the wilderness flagged it. This fraud that should be shouted from the rooftops and made into viral videos ridiculing the entire farce of big tech fact checking for accuracy.

For the few who still can’t see the profiteering Mafia as sole beneficiaries offering “protection“ from dangerous content look at the rating for WikiLeaks the only publisher in history to never make a publication error. Not one false document, not one fake whistleblower, not one retraction required ever. The rank of 27% on WikiLeaks profile wasn’t surprising it’s what the BotSentinal calculation showed.

For the record all these screenshots were taken today in pairs. Differences between the number on the profile and the Bot differ and it goes both ways with a very curious bias. An assortment of examples are posted as pairs to make of it what you might.

Maybe some brainiacs will spot a correlation, algorithm or pattern. Math is far from my long suit, but status numbers aren’t even displayed accurately. WikiLeaks and its supporters seems to be hit hardest but there’s plenty of fraud to go around for critics of vaccines or corporate oligarchs in general. Check your favorite accounts to see what their threat level is displayed and hidden.

Other variants in the wild…

The swings go the other way too but less dramatically. More like the lipstick on the pig for a more perfect face, equally curious inconsistencies because many correlate directly, but hardly significant, especially when compared to WikiLeaks supporters like Emmy pushed from “normal to disruptive.“ Seriously the lamest scale since DHS color coded threats from green to red, yet oddly similar.

Some users are just practically perfect, BotSentinal and Twitter agree!!

Something to think about… whose world are we living in? Shall we go ask Alice.